Iain Martin asked a good question today:
Curiously, amid the speculation about the possibility of the PM going to the country as early as February (the 26th is the date the Tories have circled with blue pencil as a possibility), there has been virtually no consideration of a rather important question: will Prime Minister Brown be any good in a general election campaign?
We can't be certain of the answer to this, largely because since he was elected Rector of Edinburgh University more than 35 years ago, Brown has scarcely ever needed to appear in public to persuade voters to endorse his candidacy. Of course this gives him the benefit of starting off from a position in which expectations are low and it may be that Brown's doggedness on the campaign trail will be rewarded by voters, rather as they looked fondly upon John Major's old-fashioned soap-box stumping in 1992. But that may be the best case scenario for Brown and, unfortunately for him, David Cameron is a more accomplished performer than Neil Kinnock who may well thrive on what will be, as Iain says, a more presidential-style campaign than has been customary in British politics.
That's to say that Brown may well need to have won the election before the actual, official campaign begins.
"That's to say that Brown may well need to have won the election before the actual, official campaign begins. "
Which is of course how he managed his leadership campaign last year...
Posted by: TIm J | December 19, 2008 at 10:29 AM
Your point of view a lot of benefit to me, thank you
Posted by: coach outlet | April 14, 2011 at 10:52 AM
Such a good writing, or by I saw for the first time. I'm quite happy, you are a good writer
Posted by: Nike Shox | April 22, 2011 at 09:06 AM