Via Clive Davis, I see that Niall Feguson has abandoned John McCain. In a Guardian interview he says:
Presumably this means that Ferguson is reasonably comfortable with Obama's foreign policy views. Given Niall's own positions, one might think this likely to disconcert some of Obama's more "progressive" supporters while, of course, also confirming the paleocon view that there's much less between the candidates' foreign policy "vision" (which is not to be confused with jjudgement and temperament) than is generally thought the case.
Then again, Niall likes to think of himself as a 19th - or 18th - century liberal, so it's no great surprise that he doesn't have an obvious home in either party at present. Of course, Colossus argued that, in the end, the United States didn't have the stomach to do empire properly. I don't suspect he really thinks this will change under Obama, but, rather, Obama's upside is greater than McCain's and his downside, in foreign policy terms at least, no lower.
Surely any foreign policy which does not involve greasing the shareholders of Halliburton, General Dynamics and the like and the vilification and invasion and occupation of puny dictatorial straw men has to have some merit and America attempts to improve their relationship with the world community.
Bombing muslims and terrorists into submission is hardly foreign policy outside of Alabama and Arkansas.
Posted by: Colin Campbell | October 26, 2008 at 10:54 AM
and Texas and... Look on the current electoral map for those red states (are there any left?)
Posted by: Colin Campbell | October 26, 2008 at 10:56 AM