Diana's death: cui bono? Everyone it turns out...

Megan wonders why, ten years on, Princess Diana is back on the front pages. The simplest answer, natch, is grubby: she still sells. No British paper has been more Diana-obsessed this past decade than the once-great Daily Express, but despite the sardonic ribbing it receives from the rest of the British press corps every time it trots out another "Diana's Ghost seen at Highgrove" nonsense, it sells, I understand, an extra 30-40,000 copies. Something similar must be true in other countries; indeed some of the most fanatical Diana-adorers I've met have been American. Maybe many women still do secretly wish they could be a Princess. Remember  that years before the Royal soap opera developed its more compelling storylines, her "fairytale" wedding to Charles was a monster television hit around the world.

More importantly, however, it's become clear (to me at any rate) that Diana's death, however tawdry it was in its details, has proved more useful than not. That sounds callous, I know, but there you have it. Her death, though undoubtedly awful for her sons and friends, has proved useful in other respects. This does not mean I think she was murdered by MI6.

Nonetheless, by the time of her death Diana was proving a liability. That her stardom so far outshone the rest of the Royal Family might have been acceptable had se not also - understandably - been determined to escape her gilded cage. As it was she risked doing untold damage to the institution of monarchy: while she lived Charles could never be rehabilitated, could probably never marry Camilla Parker-Bowles, and would always be subjected to questions about the succession. Diana herself would have been happy to tell friendly reporters that she thought the crown should skip Charles and pass to William. But once you set that sort of precedent, the entire institution - and everything about it - becomes open to question. It's not supposed to work like that. If one takes the (possibly old-fashioned) view that the institution is more important than any individual - no matter how beautiful - then I can't see how, ten years on, one cannot be aware of the upside to Diana's absence. She was a dangerous, unpredictable agent who could, if she chose, do untold damage (and the capriciousness of her will ought not to be forgotten) to an institution that needs to run on quiet predictability and continuity.

Diana's death also forced the Windsors to acknowledge that Britain had changed. The mawkish, indulgent, sentimentality of the week after Diana's death was not as new or as continental a development as it seemed at the time (the Victorians, for instance, were equally sentimental) but the sneering, bullying tone of the tabloids encouraged a ghastly weak-kneed narcissism on the part of the mourners holding their vigils outside Buckingham Palace. The Windsors were caught out by this and revealed to be desperately out of touch. One cannot blame them if they wished, witnessing this desperate spectacle, to remain at Balmoral. Nonetheless, the "Your People Are Hurting Ma'am: Do Something" tone of the tabloids proved useful in the end: it reminded the Windsors that no matter what the constitutional lawyers say, real sovereignty rests with the people. Her Majesty rules at the pleasure of the people and, consequently, of parliament. Her legitimacy - and that of her heirs - is conditional upon their willingness to meet the public half way. We agree to their rule (in part because the alternatives, more rational though they might be, are more trouble than they are worth as matters currently stand), in return for their dedication to public service. 

Remember that in the days after Diana's death people questioned whether the institution of monarchy could survive. Yet it has and, in fact, has flourished since Diana died. The idea of republican Britain is less popular than it was a decade ago. Politicians have noticed this: it's significant that Alex Salmond, leader of the SNP, has ditched his party's republicanism, making it clear that the Queen would remain head of state of an independent Scotland.

Other factors have played a part in this Royal rehabilitation of course. The deaths of Princess Margaret and, in particular, the Queen Mother, within a few weeks of one another, ensured a) the demonstration of great sympathy for Queen Elizabeth and b) in the Queen Mother's case, the sort of extraordinary set piece funeral that was, well, a remarkable, compelling spectacle. And why not? She was, after all, the last Empress of India. No Elton John here, thank god.

That, plus the striking success of the Queen's Jubilee (a million people lined the streets of London) confirmed that the Windsors had learned the Lampedusan logic that underpins their position: things must change if they are to remain the same.

So they have. The Royal family is a little more in tune with the shifting priorities of British public opinion; a little more responsive; a little more open. They learned the lessons of Diana's death. (Of course, it helps to have a brace of photogenic young princes to help this process - something Diana can claim some credit for).

It is hard to imagine how Charles could have married Camilla Parker Bowles - and had this marriage accepted by his people if Diana had lived. That being the case it is reasonable to suppose that Charles would be less fit to be king than he is. Whatever his faults, it matters that he's comfortable in his own skin and ready to succeed. Marriage to a woman he clearly loves helps that process; consequently it strengthens the monarchy. That being so, Diana's death has helped prepare Charles for the throne and, consequently, strengthened the institutions of Royalty.

This all seems pretty clear to me. Viewed from the cui bono perspective, I think one can say that Charles, the Queen and the institution all benefited from Diana's death. What's more, in some respects, so did Diana herself.

She died at the optimum moment for her reputation. We have generally chosen to overlook the squalor of the her final months. As it was she died as the saintly Diana, friend to the weak, the sick, the maimed, the - yuck! - "People's Princess".  That tiara that would have slipped eventually, however.  Harsh though it is to say, one wonders how long it would have been before Diana's string of love affairs with men of questionable suitability tarnished her reputation. Not too long I suspect. How long before public sympathy for her plight curdled into condemnation of her actions? Had she continued to see coke-snorting Egyptian playboys such as Dodi al-Fayed and other dubious members of that social world, one wonders how long it would have been before the public began to see her as, not to put too fine a point on it, a tart.

Hypocritical perhaps, but Princes and Princesses play by different rules. I find it highly improbable that Diana could have continued to enjoy the sort of beatific (if intrusive) press she did. At some point the pendulum would have swung against her. Just as well no-one really got around to asking just what the hell she was doing with al-Fayed anyway. Not that he was the first or likely to have been the last. There are some things the mother of the future monarch is just not supposed to do: hanging out with that kind of rich trash is one of those things.

So, yes, from the perspective of those of us who never knew her personally, and judging these matters soberly, even mean-spiritedly, it seems to me that Diana's death was her final significant public service.

That's not, it scarcely needs saying, to downplay her stardom or denigrate the charitable work she did (especially her early and generous approach to AIDS), merely to observe that her death has, rather oddly, strengthened the institution of monarchy, not weakened it.

The hysteria we witnessed a decade ago - and that is now seen by many as an unfortunate and embarrassing outburst - has passed. We can see more clearly now.

PS: The other people, of course, who may be thankful for her death are those bored by any and everything Royal. True, you will have a tough time this week, but in general there's been less attention paid to the Windsors than would have been the case had she lived.

Comments

[Panenka'sChip]

I suppose it's the 'Only the good die young' syndrome, I suppose.

I couldn't give a rat's arse about the royal family or Diana but do agree that her reputation, at least, was probably salvaged from where it might have ended up, given her later dalliances.

Piers Morgan's diaries are relatively illuminating on Diana's true state of mind and intentions towards the royal family, Charles and her sons - if you believe him that is...

[Kate]

Please explain the perspective in which you had personal knowledge of Princess Diana?

[Kate]

There can be fewer sights worse than a hack writer attempting to profit from a death on their blog?

[Kate]

I have forwarded your racist comments about the Al-Fayed family to their very expensive lawyers!

[Louis]

Agree with post 1, in that I couldn't give a monkey's about Diana.

I think Kate's a tad confused though....

Since when was calling an Egyptian, er, Egyptian racist?

And....."from the perspective of those of us who never knew her personally" would suggest that the writer did, indeed, not know the late princess.

[David]

Massie bases his argument on two questionable hypotheses :
1) "Diana'a string of love affairs with men of questionable suitability would have harmed her reputation." After Hewitt, Hoare, Carling, ad infinitum, she was still going strong in 1997. Why assume the Teflon Princess's armor plating would rub off? This is the same argument deployed against Bill Clinton ("THIS bimbo eruption will be the tipping point!")
2) "Diana's death was needed for Charles to wed Camilla". Camilla needed a death in the royal family to get hitched, but it wasn't Diana's. Charles married his mistress over the Queen Mother's dead body (does anybody think Wallis Simpson's bete noire would have stood for civil nuptials at Windsor Guildhall?) Diana could not have prevented it, and probably could have been bought off. If anybody had reason to mourn Diana it was her much-harassed replacement. She now has three in her marriage and will have to fight, not a living woman, but a sanctified ghost.

[Helen, England]

No one ever seems to remember that Diana actually loved the limelight and indeed just a short time before her death she chose to swim across to reporters to say the next thing she did was going to shock the world - prophetic words indeed! However, my point is that rather than poor Diana being hounded by the press - that there were then hoards of reporters in Paris beseiging her to find out what it was was no more than her own fault.

[soycleloure]

I'm new here, just wanted to say hello and introduce myself.

[buy viagra]

Prince Charles had known Diana for several years, but he first took a serious interest in her as a potential bride during the summer of 1980, when they were guests at a country weekend, where she watched him play polo. The relationship developed as he invited her for a sailing weekend to Cowes, aboard the royal yacht Britannia, followed by an invitation to Balmoral Castle, the Windsor family's Scottish home, to meet his family. Diana was well received at Balmoral by Queen Elizabeth II, by Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, and the Queen Mother. The couple then had several dates in London. The prince proposed on 6 February 1981, and Diana accepted, but their engagement was kept secret for the next few weeks.

[invertir forex]

Great to see a collection of blog posts that includes thoughtful and perceptive commentary. Keep up the great work!!!

[how to lose weight]

rest in peace, she a was a fantastic person

[generic viagra]

That sounds callous, I know, but there you have it. Her death, though undoubtedly awful for her sons and friends, has proved useful in other respects.

[Date A Wife]

Thanks for such a great post and the review, I am totally impressed! Keep stuff like this coming.

[Web Hosting]

It’s really great post. I would like to appreciate your work and would like to tell to my friends.

[online viagra]

Princess Diana was Really great lady

...Alex

[Kamagra]

When this news came i was really shocked.It was a mystery.I really want to know the real logic behind the accident.Till now every thing has been wavered.

[tom]

Can not give up easily, so parents do not carry the reputation of the name! http://www.mydunksb.com Everyone said good things, all good to listen to language, not Road is not good words, do not say the truth, so that good things again and again, the net language

[kennen]

"Imagination rules[url=http://www.abercrombie4uk.com]Abercrombie And Fitch[/url]
the world."

[health]

Looking too long at someone may seem to be rude and aggressive. But things are different when it comes to stare at the opposite sex. If ahttp://www.shopnikeshoe.com man glances at a woman for more than 10 seconds and refuses to avert his gaze, his intentions are obvious, that is, he wishes to attract her attention, to make her understand that he is admiring her.

[jimmy]

Life is the art of http://www.timberlandstores.com drawing sufficient conclusions from insufficient premises.

[Nike SB]

The Bayern Munich winger had missed the Netherlands' Nike SBtwo previous warm-up matches, against Mexico and Ghana, due to a hip problem.

[nike watches]

Dan! That's pretty damn funny! I love the creativity...I wish I had the time to do the same to them all. I wonder if putting a note near the "Save Comment" button would help.

Thanks for the post!

[Marry]

In harry's existence, at some pass‚, our inner foment goes out. It is then burst into zeal at hand an be faced with with another human being. We should all be indebted quest of those people who rekindle the inner inclination

[cheap nike air max]

Thanks a lot for sharing. You have done a brilliant job. Your article is truly relevant to my study at this moment, and I am really happy I discovered your website. However, I would like to see more details about this topic. I'm going to keep coming back here.

[nike shox]

So great ,Thank you for your share,I like your article very much, and I would appreciate it if you can write more article about this. We have the same opinion about this。

[fivefingers8]

read more and more books . the books should be about different kinds of topic.

["Your future depends on your dreams." So go to sleep - I am from China Wholesale]

Cool! I really hope we can keep the around. looking for China Wholesale

[Nike Shox R4 Kid]

Je suis très intéressé par cet article

[Nike pas cher]

J'ai aussi vécu ces choses

[designfurniture]

Merci pour le partage, c'est un bon article

[manolo blahnik scarpe]

thx for sharing ...xoxo

[Armani Suits]

Dan! That's pretty damn funny! I love the creativity...I wish I had the time to do the same to them all. I wonder if putting a note near the "Save Comment" button would help. http://valuesuit.com

[five finger shoes]

I am fascinated by your stories. This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. There's much more to be gained. It is the old what goes around comes around routine.

[ED Hardy Clothing]

I think your opinions are reasonable.But I don't agree with you to some extent.

[macskanman]

hi,guys ,I just put this in my site. [url= http://www.meinmanga.com/]naruto [/url]
[url= http://www.ecoapp.net/]solar panels [/url]
[url= http://www.forexforum.asia/ ]forex trade [/url]

[Nike Dunks]

I cant believe the multitude of wonderful info you have on your blog. Nike Dunks I have learned a lot from it. Will be coming back soon.

[Christmas gifts]

wow all those garments are so amazing and fabulous I don't come to your blog as often as I would like, but whenever I do I see some really amazing things keep up the good work! =)

[Abercrombie and Fitch]

Youre so right.Im lucky I did because now Ive got a whole new view of this. Wonderful read and the layout is pretty to look at

[Christain Louboutin]

Once more great article. can that kind of information with such detail. homework, and this is just.

[air water heat pumps]

"from the perspective of those of us who never knew her personally" would suggest that the writer did, indeed, not know the late princess.

[Rolex Sports Models]

Nice, and thanks for sharing this info with us.Good Luck!

[discounted designer handbags]

I have never read such a wonderful article and I am coming back tomorrow to continue reading.

[Timberland Boots]

Are you looking for a guest writer? If so, please let me know. I am sure we can help each other out!

[Nike Air Jordan]

Your view is definitely something Id like to see more of. Thanks for this blog. Its fantastic and so is what youve got to say.

[Oil Paintings]

the issue is something that not enough people are talking intelligently about. Im really happy that I stumbled across this in my search for something relating to this issue.

[Nike Dunk SB]

Just wanted to say I appricate the post. You have really put a lot of time into your posts and it is just great!

[New Balance Shoes]

I have to say you sound like a very bright person and I hope someday to be able to write as well as you.

[NFL Jerseys]

I dont think Ive seen all the angles of this subject the way youve pointed them out. Youre a true star, a rock star man.

[Abercrombie and Fitch]

As i usually preferred to publish in my site something comparable yours somehow you’ve done several perfect details here.

[Air Jordan Shoes]

I hope that you have been able to combat the spam because at the moment it is something that is making me stay away from BE.